Was fifty year old Taleb al Abdulmohsen an Arab Manchurian Candidate? |

Was fifty year old Taleb al Abdulmohsen an Arab Manchurian Candidate?

Posted on December 23, 2024 by Editor Leave a comment

Was 50 year old Taleb al Abdulmohsen an Arab Manchurian Candidate???

INTRODUCTION..

Taleb al Abdulmohsen’s atheistic (Apostate’) statements released publicly in different formats since his arrival in Germany some two decades ago should be treated as irrelevant, or at least not taken seriously without any serious and objectively supporting evidence.

Here is an obvious attempt by the German authorities to deflect public opinion from an obvious and realistic assumption that above Arab terrorist prior to committing his heinous terrorist attack, by inflicting over 200 casualties over German Christian “pilgrims” inside the Magdeburg ‘ Christmas Market, was religiously (not “anti-religiously”) motivated- compounded by his Anti-Christian hatred!

German Interior Minister’ statement that Abdulmohsen was some hard-core Islamophobist doesn’t hold the water. If he was such Islamophobic individual than reasonable expectation from him would be executing a massive (vehicular) terrorist attack against the Muslim “pilgrims” who are performing daily a massive street prayers all over the Germany (mostly in a middle of the busy streets or in the public squares)- yet he consciously decided to massacre Christian pilgrims “en masse”. This deflecting attempt by the German Authorities is clearly politically motivated, firstly to divert public anger from their beloved “Mama Merkel’s Culturally Challenged Migrants” which obvious intention is not to integrate into the Christian German society but rather to dis-integrate it from within and then “Islamize it” completely, secondly to utilize it (or even to manufacture it) as an act of their “Right Wing” political opposition and for that purpose they are already suggesting (in a subliminal way) that Abdulmohsen in fact was a “German Right Wing activist”!? Here is obviously a secondary political target in the play that needs to be publicly discredited, and you all are guessing it properly- I am talking here about the very influential German opposition party AFD.

FALSE FLAG OP OR MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE?

This terrorist attack is showing the signs, all over the place, of a carefully orchestrated and executed False Flag operation, by some very capable and very sinister intelligence services. Of course, first culprit that comes to our mind would be a German intelligence or security (BND) services- but the idea that it might a be combined (joined) False Flag operation involving two or more domestic and foreign intelligence services, also sounds quite plausible to me.

If that was the case, first “Usual Suspect” to cross my mind would be “Mabahith”- Saudi Secret Police. Involvement of Mabahith should be taken seriously here, taking to account their proven pattern of involvement in criminal and terrorist activities domestically and abroad. They started actively supporting and organizing Islamic fundamentalists in Afghanistan (in coordination with CIA) during Cold War, in the aftermath of 1979 Soviet invasion there. By the end of 1980ies Saudi, Pakistani and US sponsored Islamic fundamentalists/Jihadi fighters started forming Islamic/Terrorist organization Al-Qaeda. But Saudi/US Overt support of this terrorist entity didn’t end at this point, it just changed into the Covert support. Saudi (Mabahith) role in all of this was the most significant.

For those who naively believe that post 9/11 Saudi state and its security services evolved into some “democratic institutions” and started acting under the laws and international obligations- they should just take a hard look into the famous “Jamal Khashoggi Case” from 2018. Journalist Khashoggi, Saudi dissident and US resident, was lured under the false pretext into Saudi Consulate in Turkey, then savagely murdered and dismembered by Mabahith agents, and eventually disappeared (like “Jimmy Hoffa”) without any trace. The history of Human rights abuses, crimes against humanity and covert operations border lining or overlapping with the terrorist activities by Mabahith is too long to be cited here, but it is widely available for research through the various (some very credible) open sources.

THE QUESTIONS..

When we study some criminal act, there are always the basic questions every investigator has to ask and clarify-

Who: The suspect- His persona, His motives, His background, His associations, and finally His Motive. He was born Saudi, and allegedly he is a Shia Muslim. His motive was obviously hidden here, not necessarily by himself, but quite possibly by other “State Actors”- Certainly motive couldn’t be Islamophobic as explained by Germany authorities, because he slaughtered German Christians, not Muslims. His background is openly “Islamic” at least for the majority of his life, what kind of “cover story” has been presented today about him should be irrelevant. His authentic associations are not yet publicly relieved, but one should not exclude a possible involvement of both Saudi and German authorities. Finally his Motive, as German authorities want us to believe was Islamophobic, but judging by his terrorist act here his obvious motive or motivation was to massively murder large number of German Christians- so his Terrorist Motive can be only explained as the Anti-Christian in this case.
When: The attack took place during the holiest of all Christian holidays, practically in the eve of Christmas. Again, very supporting and very obvious evidence of an Anti-Christian terrorist attack is presented here.
Where: In one of the majority Catholic/Protestant German cities- Magdeburg, and inside the very busy Christmas Market, populated by thousands of people, at the time of attack. Again- very obvious Anti-Christian attack in play here.
How: It was a vehicular attack, mowing down hundreds of innocent Christian pilgrims, with an objective to murder or maim all of them. We remember numerous similar vehicular terrorist acts executed recently (in last couple decades) all over Europe including Germany by the Islamic terrorists- so this Abdulmohsen M/O (modus operandi) has an obvious “Jihadi Signature”. Abdulmohsen succeeded “only” to inflict casualties on a couple hundreds of them.
Why: Is the final question here? I firmly believe that Abdulmohsen personal motive was a pure Anti-Christian hatred, and likely “his cultural impediment” he experienced in Germany. But again, I also believe that some State Actors were involved covertly here. I explained their possible motives in the previous paragraphs.

WAS ABDULMOHSEN REALLY AN ATHEIST?

Final suggestion- I am aware that some sceptics will note “an apparently obvious” observation. Abdulmohsen allegedly was for a shorter part of his life (while in Germany) an atheist- before that he “was” a Shia Muslim, and thus the assumption that he was an Islamic fanatic should be dismissed here- that’s according to the German Authorities? It is hard to state categorically that he was or wasn’t an atheist, but these observations were based on his own public statements and social postings, also some information driving in this direction came from the notorious Saudi Mabahith secret police- so the possible conclusion here could be easily that all of that information was manufactured in order to hide the real motives and the real organizers of this horrendous terrorist act.

So, how would be possible that an Arab immigrant who apparently “denounced” his Islamic religion, and was leading an apparently atheistic life, can commit such Anti-Christian terrorist attack, in a “Jihadi Style”. In my opinion- very possible, if we know that some Muslims, especially Shia Muslims, have been using as their secret weapon the teachings from some Islamic Holly books called “Taqiyya” and “Kitman”. These “religious teachings” allow them to lie about their religion and/or intentions, even to temporarily convert (or leave their religion) into other religion- in order to survive or to achieve their “Jihadi goals” in a hostile environment or in the enemy state, in this case within the German state. We are citing some open sources here, which will explain the basic interpretations of the above Islamic terms:

“Generally, taqiyya is regarded as the action of maintaining secrecy or mystifying one’s beliefs. Hiding one’s beliefs in non-Muslim nations has been practiced since the early days of Islam and early Muslims used it to avoid torture or getting killed by non-Muslims and tyrants with authority.”

“Shia Muslims, as well as Sufi Muslims developed taqiyya as a method of self-preservation and protection in hostile environments. This practice is emphasized in Shi’ism whereby adherents are permitted to conceal their beliefs when under threat of persecution or compulsion.”

“While the terms taqiyya and kitmān may be used synonymously, kitmān refers specifically to the concealment of one’s convictions by silence or omission. Kitman derives from Arabic katama “to conceal, to hide”. Ibadis used kitmān to conceal their Muslim beliefs in the face of persecution by their enemies.”

“Surah quotes- the Companion of the Prophet Abu al-Darda, who said “we smile in the face of some people although our hearts curse them,” and Hasan ibn Ali, who said, “the tuqyah is acceptable till the Day of Resurrection.”

“If anyone is compelled and professes unbelief with his tongue, while his heart contradicts him, in order to escape his enemies, no blame falls on him, because God takes his servants as their hearts believe.”

CONCLUSION..

..Is left to the readers themselves, as usual.

But before jumping to that conclusion, you should take into your consideration all the above information, and you might also consult other resources. My basic dilemma here was- how was possible that an atheistic Arab, with “allegedly apparent Islamophobic prejudice” could commit a Jihadi style massive terrorist attack against Christian pilgrims. Logical conclusion would be that’s not possible- Unless Abdulmohsen actually never “left” his Islamic religion, but just concealed it for almost two decades, in order to deceive his Christian host country, while he was the most likely a member of the Islamic terrorist sleeping cell, just waiting to be activated? The Surah’s Islamic teaching about “Taqiyya” and “Kitman” certainly provide basic religious justification for such a deception on part of Abdulmohsen. Was he really Overt Atheist or he was actually a Covert Jihadi operative (and hard core Islamist)- that’s something only he can explain, if his “handlers” allow him “to survive” the ongoing interrogation.

I am inclined to believe that in fact it was a very sophisticated False Flags operation, involving at least one State Actor, and Abdulmohsen was just a suitable and expandable “Manchurian Candidate”. The time will tell..

Sigi Singidunum December 2024